Long Live Pakistan

October 19, 2008

Dr. Atta-ur-Rehman respond to allegations

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — kashifzia @ 8:20 pm

Sunday, October 19, 2008
News Desk

LAHORE: Outgoing Chairman of the Higher Education Commission, Dr Attaur Rehman, has issued a long rejoinder to nuclear scientist Dr AQ Khan who had recently criticized the performance of the HEC and Dr Atta for not using billions of taxpayers’ funds properly.

In his rejoinder Dr Atta thanked Dr AQ Khan for not doubting his and integrity but said his statement appears to be based on some serious misunderstandings as not one but 47 new universities had been established in the last six years.

“As many as 47 new universities had been established and 18 new campuses of universities have also been established during the six year period of HEC’s existence,” he said. University enrolment has almost tripled from 135,123 to 363,700 during this 6 year period of HEC thereby providing far more opportunities of our youth to acquire higher education.

“It has been alleged that 6 foreign universities were planned to be set up in Pakistan but not a single one has been established. Actually, it was only in February 2008 that 4 projects for the establishment of universities in collaboration with Germany, Italy, Austria and China were approved.

Subsequently, the new government established a Cabinet Committee to review the programme and to consider if funding could be made available for it. The Cabinet has yet to make a final decision in this respect and so the programme has been essentially frozen, largely due to the serious financial situation of Pakistan. How could money have been wasted for this programme when not a single new building for these universities has so far been built or faculty hired?

The need to establish foreign universities in Pakistan has been questioned. It needs to be understood that without a critical number of world class engineers and scientists, Pakistan cannot hope to compete in the highly competitive global economy. Our students would be exposed to high quality faculty from foreign countries, follow their curriculum, pass their examinations and get degrees from top universities from Germany, France etc.

They would therefore reach international standards of education, science and engineering in a very short period. India produces over 400,000 engineering graduates annually while Pakistan produces only about 8,000 engineering graduates. The Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) set up in 1960s helped to transform India and ushered in an IT revolution—-as a result India presently earns tens of billions of dollars in exports of software. India has also decided to expand its present programme of IITs and also significantly increase the number of Indian Institute of Science so that it could compete with advanced countries.

It has been claimed that HEC programmes have not had any major impact on higher education. This is completely incorrect as proved by the following facts:

(a) In a recent USAID Report (still in draft form) it is stated that: “We are very impressed with the breadth, scope, and depth of the reforms implemented by the HEC since 2002. No other developing country we know has made such spectacular progress.”

(b) The world’s top science journal “Nature” in an editorial published on 28th August 2008 acknowledged “the solid foundations” built by HEC during the last 6 years under my Chairmanship and urged the new government to continue to support this important sector to prevent us from going back to the “Stone Age”.

(c) The World Bank was asked by Government of Pakistan to carry out the performance audit of HEC. A 128 page report published by the World Bank has praised the excellent initiatives by HEC.

(d) The British Council in another recent comprehensive report published earlier this year has praised my own leadership as Chairman HEC in the following words “I have worked in many countries in South America, the Middle East, North Africa, and in Russia and India, over the last six years. None in my view, with the exception of India , has the potential of Pakistan for the UK university sector, largely because of the dynamic, strategic leadership of the Chairman of HEC”

(e) “Science Watch” published by the Thomson Reuters group have recently given Pakistan the “Rising Star” status in five fields of science and engineering, the highest number achieved by any country in the world.

(f) The enormous emphasis laid by HEC on research has resulted in 400% increase in research output in international journals from Pakistani universities. The research output in international journals originating from Pakistani institutions has grown from a only about 600 research articles in year 2002 to over 1714 by the year 2006 and 2407 articles in 2007.

(g) During the 56 year period (1947-2003) not a single Pakistani university could qualify to reach the ranks of the top 600 universities in the world. Today 3 of Pakistani universities are in this category with the National University of Science and Technology standing at a very respectable number 376.

(k) Previously our degrees were not recognized internationally as we had only 16 years of study programmes before students obtained the Masters degrees. HEC introduced a 4-year undergraduate programme which is being implemented in a phased manner over a 3 year period. This will result in international recognition of Pakistani degrees.

(h) A huge emphasis has been placed on quality of education. National rankings of our universities were published, thereby generating competition.. Quality Assurance Cells have been established in different universities and student evaluation of teachers’ performance introduced.

(i) Video-conferencing facility has been provided in 28 universities with the key feature of live interactive lectures from technologically advanced countries.

(j) A major national research grant programme was launched. The National Research Programme for Universities (NRPU) facilitates research pursuits of researchers. The year saw the approval of 195 projects in Agriculture, Food Sciences, Archeology, Biological Sciences, Engineering, Computer Science, Mathematics and Pharmacy for funding over a maximum period of three years. There is tangible excitement in the air where faculty members are working in their state-of-the -art and well equipped laboratories.

(k) Strict financial discipline is maintained by HEC. All its programmes have been regularly audited by government auditors as well as private international auditors. It is also the first government institution which fully implemented SAP accounting system thereby being completely transparent in all transactions.

(l) A major programme of post- doctoral training in top foreign universities has been initiated which has already benefited some 200 faculty members.

(m) A strict project monitoring system was introduced and quarterly reports are sent to Planning, Finance and the Chancellors of public sector institutions.

(n) A transparent process of appointment of Vice- Chancellors was introduced based on open advertisement and final recommendation by a search committee comprising eminent scholars.

It has been stated in an earlier article which appeared in the newspaper that too much money has been spent on higher education at the cost of lower level education. This is incorrect. Less than 15% of the entire education budget is spent on higher education. According to international norms at least 25-30% of national budget should be spent on higher education. During the last two years per student expenditure has actually gone down by about 30% due to inflation and the tripling student enrolment.

Has HEC made a difference in the last 6 years as compared to performance of the erstwhile UGC in the previous 56 years. One needs only to talk to any Vice-Chancellor of a public sector university or visit hundreds of new institutions established during the last 6 years to get a fruitful answer.

One is at liberty to turn a blind eye to HEC’s achievements, but they will not cease to exist. What is presented above are undeniable facts and in the final analysis what matters is not what my supporters or critics say, but the opinions of neutral international experts mentioned above who have carried out a detailed analysis of the Higher Education sector in Pakistan and paid glowing tributes to our achievements.

To identify me with President Musharraf or any other past government is incorrect, although I must acknowledge the tremendous support provided to HEC by General Musharraf. I am a scientist and not a politician. I received four Civil Awards (Tamgha-i-Imtiaz, Sitara-i-Imtiaz, Hilal-i-Imtiaz and Nishan-i-Imtiaz) from successive governments of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Mohtarama Shaheed Benazir Bhutto and Mr. Shaukat Aziz. I have tried to serve my country honestly and to the best of my abilities and will continue to do so Inshallah in the years to come.

October 17, 2008

A Q Khan [blasts] against HEC’s outgoing Atta-ur-Rehman

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — kashifzia @ 8:19 am

After a shocking federal minister Ishaq Khan Khakwani, Dr. A. Q. Khan speaks against HEC’s outgoing chairman Dr. Atta-ur-Rehman. Though ‘The News’ termed AQ Khan’s deliberations as a ‘blast’, reading through the allegations, it seems quite a technical and academic contradiction of view. Full Story
At one point, AQ Khan seemed biased when he mentioned about Atta-ur-Rehman and Musharraf both having background of ‘Delhi’, and Musharraf being supportive to Atta-ur-Rehman due to this reason alone. Other allegations are genuine and debatable. Despite respecting the right to object (based on personal judgment), we should not forget the positive aspects. It is a fact that a huge majority of academia, young researchers and international bodies praise the efforts put in by Atta-ur-Rehman to uplift the standard of universities and research activities in the country. Few scientists have always targeted Atta-ur-Rehman for not establishing an internationally reputed university in Pakistan, hence setting up an example. This allegation has real weight. But not doing so, does not ‘flush’ all the ‘good stuff’ that he has done. There should be an end to ‘all or none’ policy that we are used to. It suits politicians, who rely on creating fame by defaming others, but not scientists and academia, who have fame of their own and more importantly, who have moral obligations being educated and reasonable. The fate of many projects started by HEC and still underway, heavily depends on the way the matter is dealt with. As a member of the community of HEC scholars outside Pakistan, I post the request to the concerned authorities and intellectuals to have a look into the matter neutrally. Get the opinion of all sides and get what is best for the most. Most importantly, please do not deny the contracts made with ‘Government of Pakistan’ (thats exactly what we have started to face here).

Kashif Zia
HEC Scholar, Austria

I posted these notes to Rauf Klasra through email. There is one more comment posted to him from MUHAMMAD AKRAM from THE NETHERLANDS.

Dear Sir,
I read your column with Title”Nuclear scientist blasts HEC’s outgoing chairman”.It was shocking news for me when I looked at the title because it seems from the title a nuclear scientist from a defense organization has made a suicide Attack on the outgoing chairman of HEC.So Please try to avoid such kind of title which create sensation in common people.Please stop this yellow Journalism practice.why do you and your newspaper try to put all news like war against terrorism.The title of this article could be as simple as “Nuclear scientist speaks against HEC’s Outgoing chairman”.But you try to involve a bomb blast in each news.
I know Journalists that they try to get meanings of their own choice from every interview or letter.Therefore It would be nice if you Print whole letter of Dr.Qadeer in your article( As Arshaad Haqaani mostly Do).So that we can access in what sense and in what Reference to Context Dr.Qadeer commented against Dr.Atta,Because most of people from your newspaper(like Hamid Mir etc)manipulate themselves from interviews of People and try express their own feelings rather than the actual story.I often saw Hamid Mir trying to put his own words in mouth of his guests in Capital talk. you should try to give fair and balanced statements in Columns like your seniors e.g.Arshaad Ahmad Haqaani.
Now come to the statements you have connected with .Dr.Qadeer.First objection that Dr.Atta got benefits because he is from Delhi is Ridiculous. I would like to ask a question that were there only two persons migrated from Indiato Pakistanfrom Delhi one is Pervaiz Musharaf and other is Dr. Atta-ur-Rehman? . There are thousands of Pakistanis originated from Delhi,why did these people not get any benefit from Mr.Musharaf. The work done by Dr.Atta -ur-Rehman for development of higher education in Pakistan is recognized in international news paper and scientific journals.You can find articles in “The Nature” a very well known international scientific Journal recognizing Dr.Atta’s Efforts for Higher Education in Pakistan.Dr. Atta provide a chance to young talented people of Pakistan from deprived middle and lower middle class for higher education.that was only confined to Elite class of this country before Establishment of HEC .Before
Dr.Atta-ur-Rehman every year thousands of scholarships were offered from Europe and U.S for developing countries including Pakistan,but nobody in UGC and MOST bother about them and even they did not advertise all these scholarships in New papers.UGC was use to distribute these scholarships in children of Elite class and remaining scholarships were discarded.So the result was that before year2000 Presences of Pakistani researchers and scholars was almost zero,where as India had Thousands of researchers and scientists all around the world.Even Professors in foreign university say that Pakistani students and researchers were almost zero but its quite reasonable as compared to India now.As concerned about wastage of Public Funds.The actual situation is that Developed countries were providing educational funds to Pakistani government for many years for raising educational standards.These funds were misused by Politicians of
Pakistan.So these countries imposed a condition that they will give educational funds and against these funds GOP will send Students and researchers in their countries.So most of HEC scholarships are originated from these educational funds.As concerned about establishment of Universities is concerned,
these universities had to be established in collaboration of France,Austria ,Germany,Sweden. These countries were preparing workforce for these universities by giving PhD research opportunities to Pakistani students in their countries.In the mean time Establishment of Pak-France university project in Karachi.Austrian and a German university in Lahore.Swedish University in Sialkot were started .All of these project were underway but then stopped due to security concerns in Pakistan.
I just quote one example here,The Rector of Royal institute of KTH from sweden was in Marriott Islamabad Last year and he had to inaugurate a project for swedish university in Sialkot next morning when there was a blast by suicide bomber on main entrance of Marriot.Next Morning he Packed his luggage and went back to sweden.HEC had been trying to contact KTH again and again.but They never replied back.
I have tried to put some facts in front of you and i hope you will also share these comments with your readers and This time Please Do’nt use Title”A Pakistani Student Blasts against A nuclear Scientist”.Please try to have bothsides point of view before putting it into your newspaper.

With best Regards,

MUHAMMAD AKRAM
THE NETHERLANDS

Blog at WordPress.com.